|
Search
engine news web log for October 2002.
For more recent search engine news, go to our Daily
Search Engine News Blog.
Webmasters
- Click Here to add our
highlighted search engine news headlines to your site.
Highlighted
Headings = important entries
>>
=
the point where a news item from our Search Light
newsletter continues.
>>
=
regular entries and commentary
Now, on with the
blog...
31 October 2002
>>
Google has publicly launched their Google
Answers site today, after six months of testing.
How it works: Users open an account and pay
50 cents for every question they want answered. They also reveal how much they
are willing to spend for answers (from $2 to $200). The
question is then sent to Google researchers, one of whom (there are 500 of
them), searches for the answer and emails the information and related links to
the user.
The researcher
receives 75 percent of the user fee while Google keeps 25 percent. According
to this
article, refunds are offered for those unhappy with the
results.
>>
Weird Stuff People Search For : "St.
Louis Exorcism" - Well I guess we should expect
spooky stuff this time of year. Happy Halloween!
30 October 2002
>>
Norway based Per Koch of well known search engine resource site Pandia
was kind enough to enlighten us as to the meaning of Monday's Weird Stuff
People Search For. Apparently Severdigheter is
Norwegian for "sights", literally translated as "see-worthy-ness".
>>
Inktomi has just launched
their latest search technology for business: Enterprise Search 5.0. The
technology gives employees the ability to search for specific information
within a corporate network and on the Internet. The new product has been the
major focus of the search company since streamlining their business and
reducing staff numbers earlier this year.
>>
With the lack of major search engine news, someone was bored enough to write
an SEO
Poem recently.
>>
Weird Stuff People Search For : "Barry
Manilow 2003 Calendar" - Now that's scary. I guess we
should be thankful there were no matches.
29 October 2002
>>
Seems AltaVista is streamlining
their International Division to intensify the company's focus on pure search. AltaVista.co.uk
has apparently decided to shut down their free email service four days before
Christmas.
>>
Weird Stuff People Search For : "The
Day the Goose Got Loose" - Think that's weird? Look at the
result that appears!
28 October 2002
>>
LookSmart is finally becoming profitable, apparently.
>>
Weird
Stuff People Search For : "severdigheter"
- Um, Gesundheit?
25 October 2002
Changes
to Yahoo Express Submit
Yahoo has changed their Express Submit service.
Having a look at it, Express Submit is now called Yahoo! Directory
Listings and there is a new Online Account Management Center where you can
view all your listings, upgrade listings or submit new sites, update your
billing information, view previous invoices, monitor when annual fees are due
and submit a change request.
>>
For SEO's and webmasters tracking multiple domain
listings, this is great news and long overdue.
For U.S. based
searchers, the new layout and Listings Management Center is now accessible
from the suggest a site link. But from outside the U.S. it's not
accessible by default yet. In the meantime, you can view the new area here:
https://ecom.yahoo.com/dir/express/intro.
This is another step towards user satisfaction - well done Yahoo!
>>
According
to CBS, Google is censoring web sites containing neo-nazi sentiment.
Over 100 sites are thought to have been removed from the popular search
engine, making them irretrievable when conducting a related search on Google.
The move has more to do with the legal systems of the countries where Google
operates, than with any moral standpoint. France and Germany have strict laws
regarding censorship, unlike the U.S. where Freedom of Speech is favored.
>>
Weird
Stuff People Search For : "Chemical
reaction of mouthwash". Ouch!
24 October 2002
>>
Cooking
With Google: something to give new meaning to the phrase "search
engine spam".
>>
Search engine news is a bit thin on the ground today, but I did find an
interesting article by James Allison on Understanding
the New Role of SEO Consultants on the Traffick web site.
>>
Inspired by some of the weird and wacky searches found on Galaxy
Voyeur Search, I've decided to introduce a new daily feature: Weird
Stuff People Search For. To kick things off, here's today's entry: "recall
of refried beans". No matches? Well duh!
23 October 2002
>>
Some good news at last for Inktomi. They have just re-signed Internet
retail giant Amazon
for their Index
Connect program. Index Connect is like Paid Inclusion on
steroids. Designed for sites with over 1,000 pages, it involves the regular
submission of all a site's relevant web pages, including product catalogs,
dynamic pages and content archives, to the major search engines via a direct
XML data feed. Such content, (commonly referred to as the "deep
web"), is usually overlooked by search engines that are either unable or
unwilling to index it during their regular database updates.
>>
Google has become the
latest search engine yet to denounce pop-up ads. Yahoo will be next,
just wait and see.
22 October 2002
>>
The
2002 Search Engine Pub Conference in London was a huge success.
Apparently. You see I couldn't make it. A turbulent twenty hour flight to a
freezing climate just for a beer and a chinwag with other SEO's? I can get
that in the forums for free! (Well that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!)
Freeserve
Does Deal With FAST
Freeserve,
the U.K.'s most popular ISP and portal site, has done a deal
with Norwegian search firm FAST
for the provision of search services to their users. The new service, (which
replaces Inktomi), includes advanced linguistics support,
classification and categorization ability and provides many more times the
content and a freshness rate four times better than the prior service.
>>
The deal comes just
a few weeks after FAST made several technical improvements to the AlltheWeb
search engine in a bid to compete with industry darling Google. The
deal is likely to hammer yet another nail in the coffin of Inktomi.
>>
Many thanks to Blog readers who have been emailing with feedback lately. Keep
it coming! I might even feature your site if you ask nicely. Oh and in the
tradition set by my friend Jill
Whalen, all chocolate bribes will be accepted :-)
21 October 2002
>>
Ask Jeeves has become the
latest search company to cease using pop-up advertising on their
sites. Last week, the search firm ceased using pop-ups and reduced the amount
of banner ads on their search sites Ask.com and Teoma.com in
response to visitor feedback, said Vice President of Product Management Jim
Lanzone.
Other popular
portal sites including America Online, iVillage, Earthlink and Webcrawler's
Infospace ceased using pop-up advertising in the past few weeks. Could
this trend impact Yahoo and MSN too? Jim Nail, an analyst with
Forrester Research thinks so. "Web sites now think they can't afford
to anger consumers," he said. "This will pretty much be the
death of pop-ups". I say good riddance!
>>
In his Sea
Change in Search Engine Marketing article, Paul Bruemmer scoffs at the
suggestion that Pay Per Click search engine advertising has replaced SEO: "While
the uninitiated ask if PPC has replaced traditional search engine optimization
(SEO), editorial listings via SEO remain to this day a longer-lasting and
cost-effective approach to SEM in the long term". Paul also reminds
us how imperative tracking ROI has now become for any search engine marketing
campaign.
19 October 2002
Search
King Sues Google
Bob Massa,
president of SearchKing Inc. and PR Ad Network, filed
a lawsuit today against Google on the grounds "the
organization arbitrarily and purposefully devalued his companies' and his
customers' web sites, causing his business to suffer financially".
>>
Personally, I think
this is just a huge publicity stunt, designed to attract media interest,
elaborately planned and executed by a guy who is looking for someone to blame
(in this case, Google) for the spectacular downfall of his PR Ad Network
business. But hey, that's just my personal opinion and it is now up to the
U.S. Federal Court to decide. To avoid giving Mr Massa any more publicity than
necessary, I have linked to the latest ihelpyou services forum discussion
about this issue, rather than the site in question.
18 October 2002
>>
Thanks to an inspired
article by Eric Ward, I am now informed whenever another web site adds
a new link to MY web site. Eric has taken a basic Page Update notification
service and turned it into a valuable search engine marketing tool. The idea
is you sign up for a free account at Track
Engine (or a similar notification service), and specify it to look for
changes to the link search page on your favorite search engine.
So for example, if
you were interested in how many new links you receive in Google on a daily
basis, you would conduct a link search on Google
(link:http://www.yoururl.com) and enter the resulting URL into Track Engine
to be monitored. Track Engine will email you when any changes occur on
the page, (like a new link being added) and you can set it to alert you daily,
every few days or weekly. You can set it up to check multiple engines if
you're keen. Great idea!
Ask
Jeeves Heads Towards Profitability
According to CNET,
search firm Ask Jeeves Inc.
reported a lower loss and higher revenues in this year's 3rd Quarter results,
pushing the company closer towards profitability than ever before.
>> Most of the
revenues came from Ask Jeeves' Web properties business, where revenues
rose nearly 83 percent and the company's corporate search product, Jeeves
Solutions, where revenues rose 17 percent. Ask Jeeves and their search
site Teoma have also increased their database to 350 million pages indexed.
>>
Well, it seems my newsletter has been "arrested" by SpamCop. As many
of you know, I use Constant
Contact for my newsletter template creation and distribution. The
problem is that many email marketing companies also use their software in
order to spam people. Consequently, correspondence from Constant Contact is
often blacklisted by anti-spam software such as MailWasher, SpamCop, Spamnix and the
like.
I had some
subscribers tell me that this month's Search Light newsletter was
automatically isolated as spam, filed in their Deleted Items folder and
bounced back to Constant Contact servers. I would appreciate it if any
subscribers reading this who use anti-spam software would check their junk
mail list and uncheck the box next to The Search Light if they find it in
there. This should prevent future issues being treated as spam.
Oh and thanks a lot
spammers - you've just made the jobs of legitimate marketers that much more
difficult.
17 October 2002
>>
After reading my blog entry yesterday about the Wharton School of Business,
particularly the article author's claim of this being the "first
case of a company using a search engine query to advertise itself offline",
fellow blogger Gary from NZBase
dropped me a line. He says: "Ever seen the "AOL keyword - [moviettitle]"
at the bottom of most movie previews at the cinema? Does this count even
though Warner own AOL?". Absolutely Gary! I stand corrected.
>>
My friend and co-moderator in the ihelpyou
services forums, savvy, made us laugh yesterday by showing us the
funniest META tag she'd ever seen:
<meta
name="rank" position="#1">
As savvy said, ya
gotta give the author 10 out of 10 for ingenuity!
>>
Alexandre Dos Santos of meta search engine Kartoo
emailed me today to advise that their search engine has been elected search
engine of the year by Computer
Shopper magazine. I haven't checked out Kartoo for quite a few months
and was surprised and intrigued with what I found when I popped my head in
there today. When you conduct a search, Kartoo presents their top 10 or so
search results in a graphical format which you can mouseover to get more
information on. Quite unique!
>>
Michael Wong tells us, based on his own experience, How
to Justify a Search Engine Optimization Budget.
16 October 2002
>>
According to the Interactive
Advertising Bureau, Search engine advertising (paid listings) has
grown from 1 percent of total online advertising in 2000 to 4 percent in 2002,
comprising about $288 million of $7.2 billion in online ad revenue.
>>
I read an interesting article
from Andrew Gerhart at Search
Engine Guide today. In the article, Andrew goes into detail about the
Google update cycle, explaining how Google actually does two crawls per month,
one at the beginning and one immediately following their database update
(commonly referred to in the SEO industry as the "Google Dance").
Andrew claims that
most new web sites require two visits from Googlebot before they are included
in the index: "if your website is crawled in the beginning of the
month, the chances are that your website will not be included in that months
update. If your website is crawled during the second crawl of the month, which
is directly following the update, it is possible that your website will be
revisited in the next crawl and then included in the next update. Other times
Google will visit a new site and grab only the robots.txt and the homepage.
This is a good indication that Googlebot will be back during the next major
crawl and your website will be included in the update following that second
crawl. So, looking back, it seems that for your new site to be included in the
Google database it will take two visits from Googlebot".
>>
The Wharton School of Business is so confident of their Google search
rank, they are promoting their web site via radio advertisements encouraging
people to find them by typing "Wharton West" into Google.
In an interview
with CNET, Neal Neveras, director of executive programs at the school said
that "Google's quality of search and the simplicity of results"
played into his decision to use the search term in radio advertising. He said
that "because radio airtime is limited, it makes more sense to
advertise a keyword search on Google than to broadcast a long university Web
address that will be hard to remember". This is apparently the first
case of a company using a search engine query to advertise itself offline.
The school uses
traditional optimization techniques to rank well for the search query "Wharton
West", rather than purchasing positions via Google's paid advertising
program AdWords. Staff are confident their ranking for the query will
remain at the top of the results for "a long time".
15 October 2002
>>
The latest edition of our search engine newsletter The
Search Light was released today. It features an article I wrote
earlier this month called The
Search Engine Soap Opera comparing developments in the search engine
industry with the plot twists of the TV soaps.
>>
Pandia
Reports today that Google's global market share has increased nearly 2 percent
over the past two months to reach just over 55 percent, topping Yahoo!'s share
of 20.6 percent. Related statistics come from OneStat.com.
>>
An article
on TheDeal.com reveals the history behind Inktomi's unusual name: it is
derived from "a Lakota Indian legend about a spider known to defeat
larger adversaries through wit and cunning". Given the company's
pressing financial woes, let's hope it starts to take after it's namesake
soon. Personally, I'm guessing that a price hike for Paid Inclusion costs will
be forthcoming.
>>
An addendum to the latest Yahoo/Google deal comes from Danny Sullivan's
subscriber only Search
Engine Update newsletter today: Yahoo is apparently paying Google on a
per query basis as part of the deal. Yahoo also says that Google is
guaranteed a certain level of search volume.
Interesting to see
how much the deal has been sweetened for Google compared to the original
agreement between the two companies in 2000. I think this demonstrates just
how reliant on Google technology Yahoo! has become over the past two years.
14 October 2002
New
Zealand Govt. Wins Biz Domain
The New Zealand Government has successfully fought for and won the domain www.newzealand.biz
by utilizing the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) disputes
process after missing out in the initial ballot.
Buoyed by their
success, the NZ Government is planning to go after www.newzealand.com
and possibly the .net and .org versions as well. If successful, this
case could have serious ramifications and set a legal precedent for global
domain disputes.
>>
The outcome of these disputes
is bound to be controversial, whatever the result. The current U.S. based
owner of newzealand.com has successfully marketed the domain for over seven
years. They have built up solid content, links and search engine presence,
resulting in a Google PageRank of 7. To allow another party (government or
not) to just step in and take over at this point is ludicrous, in my opinion.
According to this article
in the NZ Herald, the New Zealand Government plans to use the .biz domain as
part of New Zealand ebusiness promotions overseas.
<added>Turns
out the NZ Government applied for a trademark on the words "New
Zealand" in 2001, six years after the newzealand.com domain was
originally registered. While this means they could have a legitimate claim to
the domain, it seems only fair to me that the original owners be duly
compensated should they be forced to hand it over.
Incidentally, the trademark application claims that "‘NEW ZEALAND’ is
a trade and service mark owned collectively by all NZ citizens, organizations
and the State". I'm no lawyer, but I assume this could mean any non NZ
citizens using "New Zealand" on their web site could be
infringing.</added>
>>
Well this one takes the cake. An SEO company emailed us over the weekend,
requesting we add a link to their site from our resources page. The company,
based in India, uses the word "ethics" in their company name, domain
and scattered throughout their site in a vague attempt to create an attitude
of trust in their visitors. On closer inspection, the site is nowhere to be
found in Google and has been given the dreaded PR0, meaning they must be doing
something suspicious. Provide a link to this "ethical" company? I
don't think so.
11 October 2002
Google
Wins Yahoo! Deal and Makes History
The fat lady has
finally sung. Ending many months of uncertainty and rumor, yesterday
Yahoo! announced
the renewal of their contract with Google for the provision of third party
crawler-based listings as part of their search results.
>>
The deal sees
Google go down in history as the first search engine to win the coveted Yahoo!
deal two years running. Other potential candidates for the contract included
Inktomi and FAST, the latter considered a hot favorite. But Google has
successfully defended the title of Yahoo Partner, which (according to Danny
Sullivan at Search
Engine Watch) earned them over $7 million last year.
It seems the
quality and relevance of Google's search results was the deciding factor for
Yahoo! who have taken the partnership one step further this year by combining
Google results with their own directory listings instead of serving them up
separately. Now Yahoo! users will see a more intuitive search interface and a
more integrated, relevant set of search results.
>>
Today Dotster sent me unsolicited mail to tell me how to rid myself of
unsolicited mail. Nice one.
Yahoo!
Increases Revenues by 50 Percent
Yahoo! is having a
busy week in the media - what with renewing their relationship with Google,
giving their search results a makeover and announcing their third quarter
financial results.
It's good news all
round though. According to their latest
results, Yahoo! revenues jumped by 50 percent in the past 12 months,
up from $166.1 million to $248.8 million. This is impressive, given the demise
of tech stocks and the lack lustre market in general. It's clear that
user satisfaction and the excellent example set down by Google have had a
dramatic impact on Yahoo!'s development strategy:
>>
"Despite a
challenging external environment, it is clear Yahoo! is benefiting from the
strategy and plan we laid down nearly a year ago and that our efforts to
position the company for sustainable, profitable growth are paying off,"
said Terry Semel, chairman and chief executive officer, Yahoo! Inc.
Rather than choose
an option that may have provided more financial gain (Inktomi and FAST may
have provided Yahoo! additional income from their paid inclusion fees), Yahoo!
chose to listen to their market and make relevancy a higher priority, choosing
Google instead, despite the fact that their deal with Overture prevents them
from integrating and earning additional income from Google AdWords paid
listings. However according to this
article in The Guardian, the non-exclusive deal with Google may
see Yahoo! add more third party search providers in the near future.
In my opinion,
LookSmart.com could've salvaged much of their market and continued to be a
major player in the search industry if they had taken a leaf out of Google's
book and focused on content rather than profit. Obviously Yahoo! has been
paying more attention to their users and is now reaping the rewards.
10 October 2002
Yahoo!
Combines Search Results for Relevancy
This
thread at the ihelpyou services forums reveals that Yahoo! has made
some dramatic changes to the way they serve search results. By their own admission,
Yahoo! are now combining third party Web Page Matches with their own Directory
results, in an attempt at improving relevancy.
This will please
the many Yahoo! search critics, tired of seeing spammy Directory listings win
the ranking wars. However this move also underlines the increasing industry
domination by Google. Because Web Site Matches are largely provided by the
Google index, the importance of having good Google rankings has just been
upped another notch. Certainly many webmasters who normally rank well in
Yahoo! but have trouble ranking well in Google will be losing traffic as a
result of this move. But if the result is a more relevant index for searchers,
it's a good thing.
>>
I am so fed up with all this obsession search engine marketers have with
Google PageRank™. Don't link here, don't link there, think twice before
linking to low PR sites, even for editorial reasons, watch out - your PageRank
is leaking, I mean Geez Louise! Note to self: if I ever become so obsessed
with Google PageRank™ to the extent where it starts to impact my editorial
reasoning and makes me second guess my decision to link to certain sites, it's
time to quit SEO and try something else.
Inktomi
Slashes Workforce by 20 Percent
Financial woes
continue to plague Inktomi, with the announcement
this week they intend to slash their workforce by 20 percent by the end of the
year.
>>
President and Chief
Executive David Peterschmidt made a statement, claiming: "Current
economic conditions in enterprise software mandate that Inktomi further adjust
its cost structure to move towards cash flow breakeven performance."
The cuts will see
Inktomi reduce their workforce by 85 down to 300 staff. Last year, Inktomi
laid off 18 percent of staff, citing similar financial reasons.
>>
Today I received more spam, but with a difference. No it wasn't French, but it
was so, well, polite. It was from a New Zealand based company, so maybe
that explains it. The author apologized profusely for disturbing me and being
too "forward", explained why they chose email as their contact
medium, detailed how I could easily be removed from their mailing list and
finally got to the point of their email, which was to sell me something I had
absolutely no interest in.
Funny thing was,
they were selling yet another type of web positioning software that apparently
auto-generates spammy cookie-cutter pages. The promotional language on the
site boasts: "Generate as many optimized pages as you want - directly
from your database. Make the entire contents of your dynamic website visible
in search engines!" Yeehaa - another way to ensure search engine
indexes are as irrelevant as possible! Be still my beating heart. What
intrigues me is why on earth they think that SEO's that use traditional
optimization methods would be interested in this stuff?
9 October 2002
>>
Remember those clever little cookie trails the Microsoft programmers used to
leave in the software programs - like hidden games within an Excel
spreadsheet, a Bill Clinton jibe or an unusual reference when doing a spell
check on "Bill Gates" within Word and such things? Well apparently,
the programmers at Google have a similar sense of humor. Either that, or a
remarkable coincidence occurred!
According to an article
from Computerworld, last week a search for "go to hell" on
Google, (quotes included), would've brought up Microsoft's home page in first
place, followed by AOL.com and then Hell.com. Two days later, Hell.com is in
first place, with references to Microsoft and AOL nowhere to be found. Another
coincidence? I don't think so (-;
Google
Launches Algorithm-Based News Service
One of the more
interesting developments that occurred during our blog hiatus was the BETA
launching of the Google
News Service. Compiled from over 4,000 sources worldwide, Google News
appears to offer the most relevant, up-to-date news available online.
>>
Something that Google are very proud of is the fact the service is generated
entirely by computers, with no (or little) human involvement. The following is
taken from their FAQ
Page:
"Google
News is highly unusual in that it offers a news service compiled solely by
computer algorithms without human intervention. Google employs no editors,
managing editors, or executive editors. While the sources of the news vary in
perspective and editorial approach, their selection for inclusion is done
without regard to political viewpoint or ideology".
>>
So much has happened in the search engine space over the past few weeks
(what's new right?), but the most interesting development causing flame wars
all over the search engine forums is the apparent PageRank penalty applied by
Google to SearchKing
portals.
Remember back on 25
August, we reported that SearchKing had begun to use high PageRank as a
selling tool for advertising space? Well apparently Google have determined
this was breaking their rules and punished SearchKing in the last index update
by cutting their prior PR in half, applying the dreaded PR0 penalty to their
portal sites and penalizing customer sites of their PR Ad Network. Check out
the goss on this recent development in the ihelpyou
services forums and the search
engine forums.
>>
Well today someone called Pierre sent me a romantic sounding email entirely in
French. I couldn't understand very much of it, but apparently it was imploring
me to visit a site called Jedit. I didn't bother, but I must admit I
was tempted - even spam sounds enticing in French!
8 October 2002
>>
Something for U.S. based viewers: On November 18, my forum buddy and well
known SEO Jill
Whalen of HighRankings.com is holding a seminar
at the Boston Marriott Burlington, to share her SEO secrets. For those of you
who aren't familiar with Jill, she has been optimizing web sites since 1995
and is one of the pre-eminent SEO experts in the industry. For those of you
who are already familiar with her and are based in the U.S. - I recommend you
go along to the seminar and pick her brain!
>>
Michael Wong has put together a list of Seven
Illegal Search Engine Optimization Techniques. While not all of them
are strictly illegal, those that are had a sobering effect. I still think
number 6 is just ridiculous - the entire Internet is based on deep
linking!
>>
I've come to the conclusion that it is very difficult for regional web sites
to use Overture cost-effectively. At least, that's what my recent experience
tells me.
It all started when
I set up a campaign for a client offering specific services from a particular
U.S. city. Instead of allowing our highly searched, generic (but relevant)
chosen keywords, those constipated Overture editors insisted we use
geographical qualifiers in the keywords we were bidding on and made us retype
our entire keyword listing again, adding in the regional qualifiers (i.e.
"New York City") after every keyword. This was despite the fact that
both our bid titles and descriptions included the qualifiers already.
Not surprisingly,
the traffic and clicks dropped dramatically. Now Overture tells me that we did
not meet the monthly $20 click quota so they will be deducting the remaining
$19.70 to meet the quota. Nice one Overture! Thank heavens the editors at
Google aren't as contradictory - our AdWords campaign is humming along nicely.
7 October 2002
>>
DAMNIT! Yet another misleading
article has appeared condemning SEO's and accusing them of trying to
undermine or trick the search engines. The article, which is actually a story
about the apparent demise of Google PageRank, appeared on Wired over the
weekend. The writer claims:
"...search engine discussion boards
tend to be populated by webmasters and consultants trying to outfox PageRank
in hopes of getting to the top of Google results. The
practice, known as search engine optimization or SEO..."
Oh Pleeeeaaase! This type of blanket
assumption really makes me mad and continues to propagate the undeserved
"Black Arts of SEO" myth. When I was a journalist, we had to
research a story thoroughly before publishing, avoiding gross assumptions at
all costs. Perhaps they don't bother these days?
Google
May Monetize Search Services
The big news today
is that Google is investigating ways to monetize some of their search
services. This little nugget
of information came from Omid Kordestani, senior vice president,
during a visit to Europe promoting Google's advertising products. The Google
News section (launched this month) is one service they are considering
charging consumers for.
According to Mr
Kordestani, monetization is only an option they are investigating. "So
far we have found it better to keep the service free and charge for targetted
advertising", he said. Mr Kordestani also indicated that Google had
no plans to float the company in the near future.
6 October 2002
>>
Yesterday, Tany Soussana was kind enough to email me articles written by Search123
executives James Beriker and Scott Estes about the "Federal Trade
Commission's recent landmark recommendation to the search engine industry to
improve disclosure of paid listings". Recent? This is ancient history
in the search engine industry.
I know what you're
thinking: Who are Search123? My thoughts exactly. Apparently they are yet
another PPC search engine that have sprung up in the wake of Overture's dust
cloud as they zoom towards profitability. At first glance, the articles seem
to be using the FTC ruling as an excuse for extolling the virtues of PPC
advertising, but if they offer any insight, I'll let you know.
5 October 2002
>>
I'm Baaaaccck! Didya miss me? I sure missed you guys! It's taken us a while,
but we are finally settled into our new office on the beautiful Banks
Peninsula near Christchurch, New Zealand. It will take me a few days to catch
up on all the search engine goss, but I am now officially back in full blog
swing...
(Back to Top)
Blog Archives
December 2003
November 2003
October
2003
September 2003
August
2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April
2003
March
2003
February
2003
January
2003
December
2002
November 2002
October 2002
September
2002
August 2002
July
2002
Click
below to feature our Search Engine News Blog headlines on your site.
RSS
Feed For This Page
![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png)
Or Click
Here to grab javascript code to link to the feed. If
you're linking to the feed, please consider displaying this image on your site:

Send Page To a Friend
|